When setting up a CoT number, in the inbound call route, what is the difference
when using these (2) call routes?
Voice Services -> SPx Service -> X_InboundCallRoute : {11231231234!:aa},{ph}
w/ exclamation point
Vs
Voice Services -> SPx Service -> X_InboundCallRoute : {12341234567:aa},{ph}
w/o exclamation point
An exclamation point (!) is normally used in front of a rule in a DigitMap to bar (prevent) the calling of an outbound number by forcing the match to be false:
(!1900xx.|1xxxxxxxxxx|<1>xxxxxxxxxx)
In InboundCallRoutes:
{12341234567:aa},{ph} sends calls from 12341234567 to the Auto Attendant and all others to the PHONE Port.
{!12341234567:aa},{ph} is probably not very useful as it causes calls from 12341234567 to NOT go to the Auto Attendant, which is the same as the rule not being present at all.
OK, so if I want (2) different numbers to be picked up by the aa, will this work?
{(12222222222|13333333333):aa},{ph}
where the 2's= number A, and the 3's= number B.
And all other incoming calls will ring the attached phone.
Quote from: jazzy on October 25, 2011, 04:43:33 PM
OK, so if I want (2) different numbers to be picked up by the aa, will this work?
{(12222222222|13333333333):aa},{ph}
where the 2's= number A, and the 3's= number B.
And all other incoming calls will ring the attached phone.
You've got it!
Thanks Ron, just wanted to run it by before making the changes in my OBI