Setting up an Obi 202 + Obiline in the UK (Draft)
WelshPaul:
Quote from: Mouse
Thanks for our answers. Sorry where I am going over old ground, just double checking due to the missed call.
No need to apologise, I'm trying to remember what it was that we discussed at the time. :)
Quote from: Mouse
A quick look at the 2013 admin manual suggests that * is still not supported, and the other characters you need for: 400@-30,400@-30; 2(3/0/1+2) are supported except the '@-' becomes '-' but in field 3 -6 not 2. Field 2 takes the overall duration.
So 400-30,400-30; 2; 2(3/0/1+2) seems syntactically possible but may mean nothing or something different from on the SPA!
I remember pointing out the same, for a reason that I no longer recall Mark recommended we used 400-30;2 instead. Give 400-30,400-30; 2; 2(3/0/1+2) a try. :)
Mouse:
Quote from: WelshPaul on July 20, 2015, 08:18:48 am
Quote from: Mouse
Thanks for our answers. Sorry where I am going over old ground, just double checking due to the missed call.
No need to apologise, I'm trying to remember what it was that we discussed at the time. :)
Quote from: Mouse
A quick look at the 2013 admin manual suggests that * is still not supported, and the other characters you need for: 400@-30,400@-30; 2(3/0/1+2) are supported except the '@-' becomes '-' but in field 3 -6 not 2. Field 2 takes the overall duration.
So 400-30,400-30; 2; 2(3/0/1+2) seems syntactically possible but may mean nothing or something different from on the SPA!
I remember pointing out the same, for a reason that I no longer recall Mark recommended we used 400-30;2 instead. Give 400-30,400-30; 2; 2(3/0/1+2) a try. :)
OK yes I will give it a go. Thanks very much.
(BTW I guess FSK with PR means with Polarity Reversal?)
WelshPaul:
Quote from: Mouse
(BTW I guess FSK with PR means with Polarity Reversal?)
Although I have not read any official documentation that states it does, this is what I have always understood it to mean.
Mouse:
Thanks. Do you have any idea what the correct 'Ring delay' as opposed to 'ring indication delay' should be?
The distinction I cannot see :)
I think it gets left at 4000 ATM, I have been using 0, as UK CID detects before first ring, but maybe that is risky?
Kind regards
Mike
WelshPaul:
Quote from: Mouse on July 20, 2015, 10:02:59 am
Thanks. Do you have any idea what the correct 'Ring delay' as opposed to 'ring indication delay' should be?
The distinction I cannot see :)
I think it gets left at 4000 ATM, I have been using 0, as UK CID detects before first ring, but maybe that is risky?
Kind regards
Mike
The correct value for ring delay is 400, this should have been set by the UK XML file. It's in there somewhere! :D
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page