callcentric related

<< < (2/4) > >>

RonR:
Quote from: earthtoobi on June 27, 2011, 07:57:57 pm

**275*011188888 goes out as : 75*011188888


Ok, let's work on this problem first.  In the ITSPB -> DigitMap, change:

[^*]@@.

to

@@.'@'@@.

I'm pretty sure that will make **275*011188888 go the Sip Broker test announcement.

earthtoobi:
Sipbroker worked!

RonR:
Quote from: earthtoobi on June 27, 2011, 09:24:24 pm

Sipbroker worked!


Great!  Those [^*]@@. rules are horrible.  Any place you have one, change it to:

@@.'@'@@.

I'm still trying to figure out the problem with *<00:75>xx and {(*75xx):sp2}

You are dialing *0033, correct?

Does *75xx (instead of *<00:75>xx) in the ITSPB DigiMap allow dialing *7533?

earthtoobi:
Here is my PHONE port digitmap
([1-9]x?*(Mpli)|[1-9]|[1-9][0-9]|911|**0|***|#|**1(Msp1)|**2(Msp2)|**3(Mvg3)|**4(Mvg4)|**6(Mvg6)|**8(Mli)|**9(Mpp)|(Mpli))

and ITSP2 digitmap:
(*<00:75>xx.|**275*[x*][x*].|*86|*123|1xxxxxxxxxx|<1>[2-9]xxxxxxxxx|011xx.|xx.|(Mipd)|@@.'@'@@.)

can we remove the **275*[x*][x*]. setting now that we have changed the last rule.

PhonePort Outbound call route:
{({(*75xx):sp2}|[1-9]x?*(Mpli)):pp},{(<#:>):li},{911:sp2},{**0:aa},{***:aa2},{(<**1:>(Msp1)):sp1},{(<**2:>(Msp2)):sp2},{(<**3:>(Mvg3)):vg3},{(<**4:>(Mvg4)):vg4},{(<**6:>(Mvg6)):vg6},{(<**8:>(Mli)):li},{(<**9:>(Mpp)):pp},{(Mpli):pli}

btw, have tried *00<last_2digits_of_callcentricspeeddial> and *75<last_2digits_of_callcentricspeeddial>
None work.

*75<last_2digits_of_callcentricspeeddial> is reading my obi speedial for 2 digit number.

EDIT: Changing *<00:75>xx. in itsp2 digit map to *75xx still does not work. it reads back the obi speedial number corresponding to xx

RonR:
Quote from: earthtoobi on June 27, 2011, 10:28:41 pm

can we remove the **275*[x*][x*]. setting now that we have changed the last rule.


No, **275*[x*][x*]. is still a necessary rule.

Quote from: earthtoobi on June 27, 2011, 10:28:41 pm

PhonePort Outbound call route:
{({(*75xx):sp2}|[1-9]x?*(Mpli)):pp},{(<#:>):li},{911:sp2},{**0:aa},{***:aa2},{(<**1:>(Msp1)):sp1},{(<**2:>(Msp2)):sp2},{(<**3:>(Mvg3)):vg3},{(<**4:>(Mvg4)):vg4},{(<**6:>(Mvg6)):vg6},{(<**8:>(Mli)):li},{(<**9:>(Mpp)):pp},{(Mpli):pli}


Here's your problem (you can't blend two rules together like you did):

{({(*75xx):sp2}|[1-9]x?*(Mpli)):pp}

should be:

{(*75xx):sp2},{([1-9]x?*(Mpli)):pp}

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page