Exploring Google Voice with NoMoRobo on Obi200

<< < (2/3) > >>

drgeoff:
Quote from: PDX_Mark on December 21, 2020, 10:59:04 am

Taoman,
If there are a dozen, they do not come up without some secret hanshake in the search I suppose. That is why I went through this. Also can you explain this part of your fork command in the Obi ';ui=$1'

That's what tells it where to get the number to spoof. See page 193-194 of the Admin Guide for $1 and $2 variables.

Quote

drgeoff
Because you can not confirm the number the way Google wants to, and the same phone number can not be in multiple GV users accounts!

Ah, yes. I overlooked the confirm bit.

Taoman:
Quote from: PDX_Mark on December 21, 2020, 10:59:04 am

Taoman,
If there are a dozen, they do not come up without some secret hanshake in the search I suppose. That is why I went through this. Also can you explain this part of your fork command in the Obi ';ui=$1'


Have you done a Google site search? That seems to be the best way to search the obitalk forums. Try this Google site search and see what you come up with.
nomorobo fork site:obitalk.com

This post explains the effects of ui=$1 vs X_SpoofCallerID better than I could:
http://www.obitalk.com/forum/index.php?topic=6131.msg39213#msg39213

azrobert:
X_SpoofCallerID checked also passes CNAM. CNAM is not needed here, but I just think SpoofCallerID is cleaner code.

Taoman:
Quote from: azrobert on December 21, 2020, 12:20:37 pm

X_SpoofCallerID checked also passes CNAM. CNAM is not needed here, but I just think SpoofCallerID is cleaner code.


I was under the impression that X_SpoofCallerID didn't necessarily work in all situations whereas ui=$1 does (when using sip uri format). Am I wrong?

azrobert:
Quote from: Taoman on December 21, 2020, 12:47:07 pm

I was under the impression that X_SpoofCallerID didn't necessarily work in all situations whereas ui=$1 does (when using sip uri format). Am I wrong?


AFAIK it always worked for me.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page