Should the internet connection light be on green on my Obi unit?
RevKev:
Open "Network Utility" - it's in "Applications", "Utilities".
Click on the "Ping" tab.
Paste "74.125.157.125" into the box.
Click the "Ping" button.
Here's my results for comparison:
Ping has started…
PING 74.125.157.125 (74.125.157.125): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 74.125.157.125: icmp_seq=0 ttl=56 time=37.504 ms
64 bytes from 74.125.157.125: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=39.581 ms
64 bytes from 74.125.157.125: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=34.731 ms
64 bytes from 74.125.157.125: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=37.382 ms
64 bytes from 74.125.157.125: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=35.448 ms
64 bytes from 74.125.157.125: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=36.678 ms
64 bytes from 74.125.157.125: icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=37.899 ms
64 bytes from 74.125.157.125: icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=36.804 ms
64 bytes from 74.125.157.125: icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=39.458 ms
64 bytes from 74.125.157.125: icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=38.111 ms
--- 74.125.157.125 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 34.731/37.360/39.581/1.468 ms
otherwhirl:
Ok guys,
Here's the verdict on my Ping results:
Ping has started ...
PING 192.168.1.142 (192.168.1.142): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.161 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.162 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.204 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.160 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.169 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.169 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.269 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.168 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.171 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.168 ms
--- 192.168.1.142 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.160/0.180/0.269/0.032 ms
Does this look good or bad? ???
RonR:
Your latency (ping time) is pretty high (greater than 100 ms) and worse, there's a lot of jitter in it (160 ms - 269 ms).
It would be better to have a larger sampling (run 100 consecutive pings instead of 10).
otherwhirl:
Ok Ron,
I'll run it now.
Thanks!
Quote from: RonR on January 15, 2012, 07:12:12 pm
Your latency (ping time) is pretty high (greater than 100 ms) and worse, there's a lot of jitter in it (160 ms - 269 ms).
It would be better to have a larger sampling (run 100 consecutive pings instead of 10).
otherwhirl:
Here's my latest ping results (100)
What kind of times should I be shooting for with my Obi110 system?
Who and/or what is responsible for this crazy latency I am experiencing?
What's the solution?
Thanks :-[
Ping has started ...
PING 192.168.1.142 (192.168.1.142): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.168 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.463 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.168 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.169 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.169 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.166 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.170 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.229 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.162 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.171 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.164 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.167 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=0.166 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=0.173 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=0.170 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=0.165 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=0.168 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=0.167 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=0.163 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=0.164 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=0.185 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=0.163 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=0.165 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=0.155 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=3.924 ms Oh HELL NO! :o
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=0.162 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=0.166 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=0.165 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=0.239 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=0.163 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=0.164 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=31 ttl=64 time=0.177 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=32 ttl=64 time=0.164 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=33 ttl=64 time=0.170 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=34 ttl=64 time=0.278 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=35 ttl=64 time=0.322 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=36 ttl=64 time=0.293 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=37 ttl=64 time=0.179 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=38 ttl=64 time=0.186 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=39 ttl=64 time=0.174 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=40 ttl=64 time=0.166 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=41 ttl=64 time=0.294 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=42 ttl=64 time=1.459 ms This is Ridiculous! >:(
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=43 ttl=64 time=0.281 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=44 ttl=64 time=0.260 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=45 ttl=64 time=0.267 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=46 ttl=64 time=0.321 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=47 ttl=64 time=0.276 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=48 ttl=64 time=0.274 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=49 ttl=64 time=0.170 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=50 ttl=64 time=0.166 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=51 ttl=64 time=0.281 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=52 ttl=64 time=0.265 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=53 ttl=64 time=0.165 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=54 ttl=64 time=0.224 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=55 ttl=64 time=0.218 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=56 ttl=64 time=0.177 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=57 ttl=64 time=0.841 ms WTF??? >:(
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=58 ttl=64 time=0.202 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=59 ttl=64 time=0.193 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=60 ttl=64 time=0.165 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=61 ttl=64 time=0.177 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=62 ttl=64 time=0.166 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=63 ttl=64 time=0.169 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=64 ttl=64 time=0.281 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=65 ttl=64 time=0.276 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=66 ttl=64 time=0.164 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=67 ttl=64 time=0.172 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=68 ttl=64 time=0.285 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=69 ttl=64 time=0.178 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=70 ttl=64 time=0.148 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=71 ttl=64 time=0.629 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=72 ttl=64 time=0.174 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=73 ttl=64 time=0.185 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=74 ttl=64 time=0.163 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=75 ttl=64 time=0.153 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=76 ttl=64 time=0.262 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=77 ttl=64 time=0.173 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=78 ttl=64 time=0.174 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=79 ttl=64 time=0.161 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=80 ttl=64 time=0.164 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=81 ttl=64 time=0.174 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=82 ttl=64 time=0.181 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=83 ttl=64 time=0.159 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=84 ttl=64 time=0.162 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=85 ttl=64 time=0.179 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=86 ttl=64 time=0.179 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=87 ttl=64 time=0.170 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=88 ttl=64 time=0.250 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=89 ttl=64 time=0.280 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=90 ttl=64 time=0.273 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=91 ttl=64 time=0.168 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=92 ttl=64 time=0.165 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=93 ttl=64 time=0.161 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=94 ttl=64 time=0.167 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=95 ttl=64 time=0.260 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=96 ttl=64 time=0.161 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=97 ttl=64 time=0.183 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=98 ttl=64 time=0.171 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.142: icmp_seq=99 ttl=64 time=0.166 ms
--- 192.168.1.142 ping statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.148/0.258/3.924/0.400 ms
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page