911 and the Obi110...the search continues...
RonR:
I think so. When setting these up, I like to call the non-emergency phone number and ask for permission to make a test call to 911 just to make sure it arrives and has the proper information attached.
Dixon:
I just did a test to 911. I called the contol center first to ask permission to do a test to 911. The call went through fine.
I forgot to modify before the test. So still have this in the Obi:
{911:sp2},{<#:>:li},{**0:aa},{***:aa2},{(Mpli):pli},{(<**1:>(Msp1)):sp1},{(<**2:>(Msp2)):sp2},{(<**9:>(Mpp)):pp}
That worked. I may just leave it that way.
This has a couple extry (). Are those necessary?
{911:sp2},{(<#:>:li)},{**0:aa},{***:aa2},{(Mpli):pli},{(<**1:>(Msp1)):sp1},{(<**2:>(Msp2)):sp2},{(<**8:>(Mli)):li},{(<**9:>(Mpp)):pp}
Dixon:
Also should be noted that since I only have a SIP and no DID through Callcentric that 911 has the wrong call back number.
Edit:
I just fixed this by putting my GV number (Unit Phone xxx-xxx-xxxx) in the "address 2" field. So my phone will come up with my addy.
RonR:
The '{(<#:>):li}' route is used to gain direct access to the LINE Port and doesn't affect your 911 calling through SP2. The ()'s are required for proper operation of that rule, so I would put them in so that if you ever try to use the LINE Port in the future, you won't spend a lot of time trying to figure out why it's not working correctly. There's also potential for an unexpected/unexplained side-effect to some other function that might be tougher to identify at a later date.
It's always best to do it 100% right. I'd stick with:
Code:
{911:sp2},{(<#:>):li},{**0:aa},{***:aa2},{(Mpli):pli},{(<**1:>(Msp1)):sp1},{(<**2:>(Msp2)):sp2},{(<**8:>(Mli)):li},{(<**9:>(Mpp)):pp}
You shouldn't have to make another 911 test call.
Dixon:
Quote from: RonR on March 19, 2011, 01:35:06 pm
The '{(<#:>):li}' route is used to gain direct access to the LINE Port and doesn't affect your 911 calling through SP2. The ()'s are required for proper operation of that rule, so I would put them in so that if you ever try to use the LINE Port in the future, you won't spend a lot of time trying to figure out why it's not working correctly. There's also potential for an unexpected/unexplained side-effect to some other function that might be tougher to identify at a later date.
It's always best to do it 100% right. I'd stick with:
Code:
{911:sp2},{(<#:>):li},{**0:aa},{***:aa2},{(Mpli):pli},{(<**1:>(Msp1)):sp1},{(<**2:>(Msp2)):sp2},{(<**8:>(Mli)):li},{(<**9:>(Mpp)):pp}
You shouldn't have to make another 911 test call.
Ok. I put it in as you advised. Thank you for helping!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page