Just Bought OBi202 Need Help
Shale:
Quote from: RFord on March 18, 2013, 02:19:58 am
If you need to block a outgoing number (or a series of numbers), the syntax is:
|!(1abcxxxxxxx)| or |!(1abcxxxxxxx|1abcxxxxxxx)| or , where abc is the area code, xxxxxxx is the digits associated with the block numbers
This would be incorporated into the ITSP Profile X>>>General>>>DigitMap
You are not saying that the method pwnage suggested will not work, are you? I think his method would work also.
Here is an example line from Outbound Call Route Configuration
section of the OBi Device Administration Guide:
"!1900xxx xxxx – Barring all 11-digit numbers that start with 1900"
It was not clear at all to me where that would go into a DigitMap. Here is my actual ITSP Profile A Digit Map:
(1xxxxxxxxxx|<1>[2-9]xxxxxxxxx|011xx.|xx.|(Mipd)|[^*#]@@.)
Let's suppose the number to bar is 6065559999 (I don't like using x to represent a specific number, because x is used in real strings).
How would you modify
(1xxxxxxxxxx|<1>[2-9]xxxxxxxxx|011xx.|xx.|(Mipd)|[^*#]@@.)
to prevent dialing out to 6065559999 or 16065559999?
ianobi:
Hold on, this could be a bumpy ride :) These call barring rules can be very tricky. I have looked at them before:
http://www.obitalk.com/forum/index.php?topic=4799.msg31198#msg31198
Let’s look at this particular case. In theory this should work for an outgoing DigitMap:
(!1?6065559999|1xxxxxxxxxx|<1>[2-9]xxxxxxxxx|011xx.|xx.|(Mipd)|[^*#]@@.)
In practice it blocks 6065559999, but does not block 16065559999. This is because rule 1xxxxxxxxxx provides a better match for 16065559999 than the rule !1?6065559999. Looks crazy, but that's just how the “precedence rules” seem to work – this is not documented anywhere that I can find.
This digitMap does block both numbers:
(!16065559999|!6065559999|1xxxxxxxxxx|<1>[2-9]xxxxxxxxx|011xx.|xx.|(Mipd)|[^*#]@@.)
For an InboundCallRoute this, as suggested by Shale, should work:
{(1?6065559999):},
This is because there are unlikely to be other rules that might take precedence.
Confused? A lot of us are a lot of the time :D
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page