cant get distinctive rings to work again
Jackson:
I guess you got i solved. I had switched my ring patterns as by default SP1 had a single ring and SP2 a double.
Under Ring profile:
Produces a single (normal ring)
RingName: Bellcore-dr1
RingPattern: 60;(2+4)
This value will produce a double ring.
RingName: Bellcore-dr1
RingPattern: 60;(.4+.2,.4+2)
vtsnaab:
Great topic !!
It brings to mind some problems which I've been wondering how to solve as I do use 2 different incoming numbers with my Obi.
There are 2 problems with the whole Obi ring settings thing as I see it=>
1. Using the default ring settings with a modern phone (as opposed to a phone with a real bell...) can become utterly useless without a bell-type, normal, mechanical response=> so as a result the default ring settings DO NOT make my phone sound any different for SP1 vs. SP2, and;
2. There is no way to know what all those different ring patterns will sound like except to edit the settings over & over with each test making the Obi reset.
My Obi110 has totally unaltered, default ring settings.
The 'ringer' in my phone is a sort of electronic gurgle sound...no even close to a ring sound.
The settings my Obi has currently look exactly the same as the ones cited here:
Quote from: Jackson on May 30, 2014, 05:16:21 pm
Produces a single (normal ring)
RingName: Bellcore-dr1
RingPattern: 60;(2+4)
This value will produce a double ring.
RingName: Bellcore-dr1
RingPattern: 60;(.4+.2,.4+2)
Query:
Can anyone here propose a better way to deal with getting distinctive rings tested & working better than what I've tried to describe, please ??
(Perhaps a really simple explanation of how to interpret all the numbers and such in the ring pattern settings ??)
Thanks for any helpful replies.
azrobert:
The pattern is:
(Ring Seconds+Silence Seconds)
60;(2+4)
Ring 2.0 seconds, Silence 4.0 seconds Repeat
60;(.4+.2,.4+2)
Ring 0.4, Silence 0.2, Ring 0.4, Silence 2.0 Repeat
See page 163:
http://www.obihai.com/docs/OBiDeviceAdminGuide.pdf
I have an electronic ringer on my phones and the ring patterns work for them.
Try something like:
60;(3+4)
and
60;(1+2)
vtsnaab:
Thanks Azrobert !!!
I did find info at pages 169-170 in the manual - I did look for it - but it is not very helpful the way it is written and did not make as much sense to me as your nice, simple explanation does.
Now I feel better about messing around with those settings and will try making some changes.
Thanks, and Best Wishes.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page