GoogleVoice OAUTH + Configure locally
ramjet73:
Quote from: Rick on October 17, 2014, 12:31:40 pm
Steve, if you could get them in direct touch with GV I, and I'm sure others, would greatly appreciate it.
FYI, I purchased a California (closest I could get to Hawaii) Dirt Cheap DID a few days ago and haven't had a missed call or incorrect CID on my incoming Callcentric connection to my OBI202 via GV since then. I'll report back in this thread if I do in the future.
You can only expect so much for free and there are diminishing returns on spending more time on a problem that might be fixed temporarily and then come back again. My personal preference is to use a solution that I can trust to work even if it costs a few dollars a month. After all, how much do you spend monthly for your cell phone(s)?
ramjet73
Rick:
I've asked CC to provide me with DIDs (not the free ones) to prove to them that the issue is with their free DIDs, and the problem is not GV, it's theirs. There is absolutely no reason for this to exist, then be fixed, then exist, ... Simple coding of the pathways to not use what breaks.
I have put my main number to forward to IPComms and then CC and it works flawlessly. My other number gets infrequent calls and if I miss one the GV email will let me know within minutes, plus the cell can pick it up.
I had no issues from May until September.
MikeHObi:
Quote from: Rick on October 18, 2014, 02:19:52 pm
I had no issues from May until September.
Such random issues with GV forwarding to providers is why I had to dump GV. I can see what Callcentric is saying in that they want someone to show them that the call is failing on their equipment. Because if you call the Callcentric DID from anything other forwarded through GV, the call completes. Google seems to be trying to say that once they touch the first system outside of their network, the problem is no longer theirs. So they are not actually trying to find where the problem is. And since you can't actually get in touch with anyone for Support at google voice, you are just stuck.
A great free service when it works but sometimes it does't work.
Rick:
With Steve's help we're very close to Google and CC engineers speaking on the phone. They will then have the ability to prove the issue(s) - is it just free DIDs? Or just DIDs handled by Telengy? Is it just Broadvox or Bandwidth.com or both?
If it's identifiable and fixable, then GV should be able to lock the problem pathways out of their algorithms and not have it occur again, if they want to.
MikeHObi:
Quote from: Rick on October 21, 2014, 12:04:35 pm
With Steve's help we're very close to Google and CC engineers speaking on the phone. They will then have the ability to prove the issue(s) - is it just free DIDs? Or just DIDs handled by Telengy? Is it just Broadvox or Bandwidth.com or both?
If it's identifiable and fixable, then GV should be able to lock the problem pathways out of their algorithms and not have it occur again, if they want to.
That will be great for you and your DID. But when I used GV I saw the same problem on my Callcentric DID and my Anveo DID. That tells em that there needs to be a processes to expedite the corrections of these types of issues. Would you consider the process you've gone through one that is expeditious?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page