Google Voice forwarding to CallCentric Again?
dircom:
I agree with Carl, It would be sad if CallCentric quit providing free service, because they were annoyed with people demanding they talk to Google and fix the problem.
I am paying for Voip, in addition to using some of the free services, GV, CallCentric, IPCOMMS
I get reliable Caller ID. Several VOIP providers are less expensive, than just the taxes alone from the legacy providers.
MikeHObi:
Quote from: Rick on October 22, 2014, 04:42:30 am
I'm looking forward to GV and CC providing each other with the technical data that shows exactly what was/is happening so that whoever needs to can make permanent adjustments that aren't modified by "seeking cheaper routing" software or accountants.
While I do believe there are people at google that care, I have no faith that Google itself cares one bit about these problems. They have been occurring for over a year and seem to keep occurring with no resolution. If you were having these types of problems with Anveo calls to Callcentric or Future9 making calls to Anveo, you know that the issues would get resolved quickly.
I continue to use GV for my cell phone. But it remains unreliable for use for a home phone if you want to foward it through another provider to get CNAME.
VOIPisGreat:
The callerID has been broken from GV to CC free DID again for me since yesterday. All the calls show "anonymous" now....
Rick:
I was concerned that when everything worked great on 10/22, before Google called CC, they wouldn't be able to see the problem. Alas, I should have had faith that it would rear its ugly head again.
I'd like to say whether mine comes through or not, but my GV forwarding is now back to a delay of 4 rings before CC gets the call, which results in only 1 ring before the call goes to GV Voicemail, so nothing shows on the display...
GV => Free DID - 4 rings, then house phone rang, then went to voicemail.
Testing via IPComms rang immediately and showed the number (GV => IPComms => CC).
Testing Dirt Chip DID rang instantly and showed number (GV => Dirt Cheap DID)
Testing again GV => Free DID - 4 rings, then voicemail, house phone never rang.
Taoman:
Quote from: Rick on October 24, 2014, 06:05:52 am
Testing via IPComms rang immediately and showed the number (GV => IPComms => CC).
Testing Dirt Chip DID rang instantly and showed number (GV => Dirt Cheap DID)
Interesting. Were you able to show or was Callcentric support able to see that the "Dirt Cheap" DIDs appear to work fine with GV whereas the Free DIDs do not? I'm just wondering if CC acknowledges this or if they still put all the blame on Google Voice (which is where it may belong for all I know)?
Also, I'm curious in the perceived difference (if any) between the IPComms DID and the Dirt Cheap DID. Does one ring your phone quicker than the other? Can you tell any difference in call quality between the two?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page