Ring.to
cluckercreek:
Caller ID works just like GV, number only. I've not tried 3 way calling but have used the text.
dircom:
caller id and 3 way calling are all they need, guess i will post on Ring.to forum
thanks
rolandh:
I've been using RingTo on my OBi 200 since July. For my purposes it works well. I haven't tried 3-Way calling. Like GV, MWI is not supported. RingTo will set outgoing CNAM manually upon request. Support for incoming CNAM is planned but, not yet, available. GV supports neither incoming or outgoing CNAM. There are workarounds for incoming CNAM that work equally well with GV or RingTo.
They will port the landline for free. Should things not work out you'll be able to port out to a prepaid mobile carrier, again for free. You'd then be able to move the number to GV.
I wouldn't say that it's better or worse than GV. It depends on your needs.
rolandh:
I tested 3-way calling this morning by placing a call from RingTo on my OBi 200 first to my moto x, hit flash got dialtone then called my iPhone. I was able to carry on a fascinating conversation with myself between the handset attached to my OBi and my two mobile devices simultaneously; so, for me, it works.
I've got nothing against GV but, for my needs, I like RingTo a lot. As the upstart, I find them very willing to listen to customer feedback regarding future service enhancements.
Cheers! Roland
zorlac:
I looked at the stats on a friend's new obi200 with GV setup through a whiz bang Comcast router on a +20Mb connection and there were quite a few dropped packets there too.
So I'm starting to think that maybe RingTo could yield a more solid connection than GV.
I might have the ability to test my theory when my obi200 shows up & I find a number to port to RingTo. (Not really sure how to go about this?)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page