Callcentric call treatments.
SteveInWA:
Well, yes, it's semantics. But no, the "point" is that "supports" is a vague term, that can lead to discussions of how to work around it, or why it doesn't work. In fact, you're right; it doesn't work, and that is all that really matters. But, it's not working on purpose, by fundamental technical design of the system, not that Google chooses not to support early media. I am just trying to clear up the fact that GV is working correctly according to its design, and that design precludes using two different call-handling systems chained in series.
We deal with this issue on the GV forum occasionally, and users will flail around, either arguing that Google "should support this", or wanting to know why Google won't "support this", so it is actually a significant point over there. So yeah, call it the "Steve Weinberg memorial nit-pick answer" if you wish, but "ignores" is a more accurate term.
Taoman:
Quote from: SteveInWA on February 04, 2015, 06:16:16 pm
..... but "ignores" is a more accurate term.
Agreed. "Ignores" is a more accurate term and one I will use in the future.
SteveInWA:
Great! I'd post a photo of puppies, but I'll just say "Thanks for the good conversation, and for your contributions to the forum."
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page