Vestalink Now "Supports Direct Integration With Google Voice"
LTN1:
Quote from: Vestalink on March 23, 2015, 09:46:19 am
No, thats not correct (just read his post). Vestalink acts as a bridge between SIP and XMPP so that you can use any ATA or desk IP phone with your Google Voice account. There is no forwarding involved, its a direct connection.
Can the Vestalink ATA be used exactly like the OBi with Google Voice without having any connection to Vestalink like the OBi can right now?
I understand that the Vestalink ATA is claiming that it can act as a bridge to Google Voice but can the purchaser not sign up to a Vestalink plan at all and just use the Vestalink ATA with Google Voice permanently and without limit like the OBi?
Vestalink:
Thats not what the device is claiming, it works with Google Voice through Vestalink. I made an edit to the Amazon posting so it is very clear and there is no confusion.
LTN1:
Quote from: Vestalink on March 23, 2015, 10:13:40 am
Thats not what the device is claiming, it works with Google Voice through Vestalink. I made an edit to the Amazon posting so it is very clear and there is no confusion.
I'm glad you made that update. It is much clearer now. Thanks.
ceg3:
OK, so the answer to my question about using the VL Grandstream as a Google Voice connected device without signing up with VL went from yes to no. You still need a subscription with VL to use the Grandstream ATA with your Google Voice number. This has all been just a bunch of tail chasing, but hasn't it been fun? ;D
billsimon:
What are the pros and cons of device-side GV connectivity vs. a SIP channel to server-side GV interconnection? Interested in hearing some thoughts on this.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page