Thanks for the pointer, TrapDoor. The thread was interesting reading. Unfortunately, I'd have to take my 202 out of service, reconfigure it as a router, and then replace my existing router with it. That's just too much trouble to answer a question that is at best a curiosity. Indeed, I'm more interested in the size of the NAT table -- the number of connections it can support.
If someone else does check this out, please do post the results here.