Started by lk96, January 08, 2012, 08:29:49 PM
Quote from: lk96 on January 14, 2012, 07:59:11 PMHow can I instruct the Obi to use a VG or a trunk *other* than the SP1 and SP2 to dial out the destination number ?
Quote from: lk96 on January 21, 2012, 11:13:52 AMI dialed trying either the standard or premium access lines (ie 0011101 and 0011103 prefixes).The Obi reports: Register Failed: 500 Method not allowed (server=184.108.40.206:5060; retry in 25s)
Quote from: lk96 on January 21, 2012, 11:13:52 AM2. I'd like to simplify the dialed digits when using the Voxbeam trunk and to normalize thedialing to that of other services (this is mostly for my other "customers" in the house thathave little tolerance for new dialing habits). So suppose I want the following:if I dial on the handset **2 011 nn 1234567890 (nn=country code), the obiconverts it to appropriate # for the voxbeam trunk that will look like:0011101 nn 1234567890
QuoteHave you listed your IP address at Voxbeam?:
Quote from: Stewart on January 21, 2012, 12:05:12 PMIn addition to what RonR posted, please note:1. Voxbeam will not accept a registration (there is no need, as they don't sell phone numbers or incoming service of any kind). So, if you put them in SP1 or SP2, turn off X_RegisterEnable for the service.
Quote2. Voxbeam requires proper NAT mapping. In your setup, that does need STUN. Set STUNEnable and set a working STUN server in STUNServer (mine is currently set to stun.ekiga.net).
Quote from: lk96 on January 21, 2012, 09:04:56 PMAfter taking care of all of the above, I still get "fast" rejection of any calls I try to make overthe SP2 trunk where I placed the Voxbeam account.Any other ideas or things to check?
Quote from: RonR on January 21, 2012, 11:37:15 AMThe following will prepend 0011101 to all calls sent using SP2:Service Providers -> ITSP Profile B -> General -> DigitMap:(<0011101>(1xxxxxxxxxx|<1>[2-9]xxxxxxxxx|<1aaa>[2-9]xxxxxx|<011:>xx.)|(Mipd)|[^*#]@@.'@'@@.)where aaa is your local (US) area code.
Quote from: lk96 on January 23, 2012, 03:00:38 PMDo I have this right?
Quote from: lk96 on January 23, 2012, 03:00:38 PMIf so, then the above syntax is no obvious from the admin documentation.