Quote from: RonR on April 23, 2011, 10:58:05 PM
Yes, you can redesign the entire dialing syntax, but what you're proposing is a considerable amount of change to the PHONE Port DigitMap and OutboundCallRoute to effect a new dialing methodology. I may be wrong, but I doubt that's what the OP is looking to do at this stage. It also seems to me to be overkill just to avoid dialing the occasional **n prefix.
I agree with the last sentence. As far as the first sentence, there are only 2 changes to make in each place.
There is no telling what the OP wants to do if they desire to eliminate pressing 2 digits from the default dialing sequence.
On the Obi100 # can be assigned in place of **9 because there is no line port & **2 can be shortened to *2 which does no conflict with star codes in any way.
default digit map
([1-9]x?*(Mpli)|[1-9]|[1-9][0-9]|911|**0|***|#|**1(Msp1)|
**2(Msp2)|
**9(Mpp)|(Mpli))
edit to
([1-9]x?*(Mpli)|[1-9]|[1-9][0-9]|911|**0|***|#|**1(Msp1)|
*2(Msp2)|
#(Mpp)|(Mpli))
default outbound call route
{([1-9]x?*(Mpli)):pp},{**0:aa},{***:aa2},{(<**1:>(Msp1)):sp1},{(
<**2:>(Msp2)):sp2},{(
<**9:>(Mpp)):pp},{(Mpli):pli}
Edit to
{([1-9]x?*(Mpli)):pp},{**0:aa},{***:aa2},{(<**1:>(Msp1)):sp1},{(
<*2:>(Msp2)):sp2},{(
<#:>(Mpp)):pp},{(Mpli):pli}
Or switch them up, *9 does not conflict with star codes either