Quote from: SteveInWA on April 19, 2018, 08:56:32 PM
I had a particular reason in framing my response, to get you thinking like a businessperson, not as a home-based DIY person. Your business is insurance, not fiddling with phone gadgets, and many small business that fail, do so because the owner is either not competent at their core business (I'm not implying that's the case with you), and/or they spend too much time on non-revenue-generating activities. This forum is mostly about consumer/hobbyist/DIY use, as opposed to business use. There has been a major shift in business telephony over the past decade, away from analog telephone tech, and away from local PBX hardware, to more reliable and flexible, cloud-based solutions that are easy to manage.
Thanks, what you say makes a lot of sense. I do think that tendency to try and do and learn everything is a fault of mine. My father made the same point with regards to repairing his vehicles. He said he could make more money focusing on the insurance sales vs what he would save by buying all of the necessary tools and learning how to fix everything that came up with the family vehicles.
On the other hand, I have a brother-in-law who is an electrical engineer & a high level manager who does an unbelievable job of repairing his own vehicles and ours as well. Pretty amazing to me, but he does spend a lot of time on it all, we both have quite a few vehicles. He says it is like a hobby to him, though. He said others play golf, or watch TV etc. while he makes and repairs things. His point of view seems to have some validity too, though I think he takes it to an extreme & gives up sleep too often, which may have an adverse impact on his health over time.
It seems like the trick is to find a good balance. I do think you are right in pointing out that I have a tendency to reach too far & miss that healthy balance at times.
QuoteThe beauty of using a cloud-based Internet Telephone Service Provider, or ITSP, like Callcentric is that there is no VoIP PBX skill needed, there is no contract, and you can add, change, upgrade/downgrade or cancel service at any time.
Yes, those do seem to be strong reasons for having a cloud solution. On the downside, a couple of the reviewers complained about their Callcentric phone system going down for a couple of weeks or so when a hurricane hit Florida & their electricity/internet went down, even though the consumers were nowhere near the catastrophe.
That may be a pretty tiny risk, but potentially a very big one. It does roughly double the odds of an outage when there are two separate sites in two very different parts of the country that could shut the system down.
On the other hand, a dedicated site is probably more likely to have redundant systems & up-to-date equipment, software and maintenance than if I tried to do it on my own premises.
QuoteJust because you have sunk cost in your existing OBi and magicJack stuff, doesn't necessarily make it something on which to base your decisions.
Another good point. I do think it's good to at least take assets on hand into account. Can't let it cloud my judgement though. It's probably akin to the gambler's warning against trying to recoup losses and making bad decisions in the process.
QuoteGoogle Voice is generally reliable, however, there is no direct technical support at all, and problems do arise, that sometimes take weeks or even months to resolve. It is just not worth the business risk to save a few dollars on phone costs.
That definitely makes sense. It was a draw to me as a way to justify buying new equipment to my wife. If it would save more than it cost in a relatively short time it would be a no-brainer, even for her. But if it's not a smart move, it's better to be aware of that up front.
QuoteRE: fax: go look at the prices. You can have a dedicated fax DID for $1.95/month, and you can be charged only when the line is being used, per minute, at very low rates. You don't have to decide on this now; you could keep your current solution and change it later.
Yeah, I hadn't checked the prices there. What you say makes sense, & maybe I could port that number & use the Magic Jack for a fallback home landline for the time left on it.
QuoteRE: OBi IP phones: the 1000-series are 1st generation products, and they will be supported for a few more years, but I believe they will probably go away after current stock is depleted. The current product is the 2182, and it is not going away as a result of the Polycom/Obihai merger. Obihai is now part of Polycom, and they're in the process of merging their IP phone product lines. I checked with them this afternoon, and these comments are based on their latest plans.
Thanks for that info. I wasn't aware of the Polycom/Obihai merger, nor of the product end of life details. It does seem odd to me, though, that the 2182 has so few product details listed on the Amazon website.
QuoteRE: using your OBi 300 units: yes, you can do that with a SIP VoIP ITSP, but you would need to use both of them, one for each physical phone line. You could also dedicate one of those to a fax line.
I believe they are Obi 302s with two phone ports on each. I'm thinking that would be enough for both phone lines & the fax, or alternatively, both phone lines for my home office & perhaps another 2 phone lines at my Father-in-law's or another off site office.
Could the Callcentric or other services work well for ringing phones at 2 separate locations? Could it "simulring" a landline & my cell phone? I also occasionally use the Google Voice option of switching from the landline to the cell phone or vice versa mid-call, which is handy if I'm leaving the office, or returning. I'm not sure if that is a common feature, or if it is unique to Google Voice.
QuoteRE: Callcentric: I wouldn't put any stock in random crap on the internet about VoIP (or random crap reviews of anything, for that matter... cough-Yelp-cough). There is always some person complaining bitterly about anything, like the restaurant review where the person was outraged that the waitress brought their water with ice in it. Anyone else here on this forum can vouch for their service quality and reliability, as is also the case with voip.ms. They are far cheaper than Vonage, which seems to start out with a phony loss-leader price and then doubles it with fees and taxes. The ITSPs I mentioned don't do that.
Yeah, I guess I should take the reviews with a grain of salt. That's a good point about the "bait & switch" by Vonage. I think they have done that to me in the past.
re: IP phones:
What are the main advantages of an IP hone vs an ATA with an analog phone (or 2) for a 1 man office?
eg. Callcentric lists 3 channels for an incoming #. Does that mean a multi line IP phone could have 3 simultaneous calls to the same # coming in?
Is an ATA needed if one has an IP phone?